On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 04:57:01PM +0100, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > Hi Emily, > > On Thu, 24 Oct 2019, Emily Shaffer wrote: > > > In some cases, it could be that the user is having a problem with an > > object which isn't present in their normal object directory. We can get > > a hint that that might be the case by examining the list of alternates > > where their object may be stored instead. > > Doesn't this open the possibility of leaking project's (possibly NDA'ed) names? > > I could imagine that we might rather want to count the alternates, and > maybe separate into those alternates that actually exist and alternates > that do not exist (which would produce a warning that the user might > have trained themselves to ignore). Sounds reasonable. Will do. - Emily
