Am 17.11.19 um 09:19 schrieb Markus Elfring: >> Which transformation rules are questionable and why? > > It was chosen to transform source code fragments (pointer expressions) > by two SmPL rules so that the search pattern “sizeof(T)” would work > in the third rule. Ah, right, it would be nice to get rid of those normalization rules, especially the second one. I don't see how, though, without either causing a combinatorial explosion or loosening up the matching too much. >> Matching sizeof of anything (with the x) can produce inaccurate >> transformations, as mentioned in the other reply I just sent. > > Would you like to apply any further SmPL code fine-tuning? I guess that's a question for Junio, and his reply in https://public-inbox.org/git/xmqqa790cyp1.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ seems relevant. René
