Hi, On Tue, 24 Jul 2007, Alex Riesen wrote: > On 7/24/07, Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, 24 Jul 2007, Alex Riesen wrote: > > > On 7/24/07, Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > When asking "git log -g --all", clearly you want to see only those refs > > > > that do have reflogs, but you do not want it to fail, either. > > > > > > > > So instead of die()ing, complain about it, but move on to the other > > refs. > > > > > > > > > > I believe you wont even see these complaints: the pager will start shortly > > > afterwards and fill the screen with commits, completely hiding the errors. > > > > You can see it briefly, but it is hidden by default. Which is a good > > thing. If you set the pager to "cat" (which is happily not the default!) > > you can see them clearly. Until you are swamped by the rest of the > > output. > > > > Maybe this is a feature? > > > > Maybe. I can't see it at all. Should I downgrade something or propose > a patch to put some delay after this error? I think not. > > I think second Junios suggestion, but this is of course no > difference to me. Okay, two votes are enough to make me reconsider. Junio, could you please replace the two "error(...)"s by "-1"s? Only if you apply the patch, of course... Ciao, Dscho - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
