Denton Liu <liu.denton@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> In a future patch, we plan on running tests with `set -o pipefail`.
> Since zipinfo is killed by SIGPIPE, it will return an error code which
s/is killed/may be killed/ for the reasons I wrote for 23/27, I think.
Otherwise the idea behind the patch is good.
Thanks.
> will propogate as a result of the pipefail.
>
> Mask away the return code of zipinfo so that the failure as a result of
> the SIGPIPE does not propogate.
>
> Signed-off-by: Denton Liu <liu.denton@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> t/t5004-archive-corner-cases.sh | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/t/t5004-archive-corner-cases.sh b/t/t5004-archive-corner-cases.sh
> index 3e7b23cb32..4c6d42d474 100755
> --- a/t/t5004-archive-corner-cases.sh
> +++ b/t/t5004-archive-corner-cases.sh
> @@ -153,7 +153,9 @@ test_expect_success ZIPINFO 'zip archive with many entries' '
>
> # check the number of entries in the ZIP file directory
> expr 65536 + 256 >expect &&
> - "$ZIPINFO" many.zip | head -2 | sed -n "2s/.* //p" >actual &&
> + {
> + "$ZIPINFO" many.zip || :
> + } | head -2 | sed -n "2s/.* //p" >actual &&
> test_cmp expect actual
> '
