Re: [PATCH v3 4/9] bugreport: add config values from whitelist

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 10:37:13AM +0900, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Josh Steadmon <steadmon@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > This and git_config_bugreport() below should both be static as well.
> > Rather than repeating advice on the later patches, I'll just note that
> > any new functions that don't show up in the corresponding .h file should
> > be marked static.
> 
> Good advice.  
> 
> More importantly, given that "git bugreport" itself has no service
> of itself to offer other existing parts of Git (it is just a "gather
> various pieces of information from different places, and then
> produce a text file output" application), I do not see much point in
> it having its own header file that others would #include (i.e. the
> include file is to define services that are offered by it).  If
> there are common enough service routines invented to support the
> need of bugreport.c (e.g. perhaps it wants to give more info than
> what is currently available via the existing API on the contents of
> in-core index), by definition of being them common enough, they
> should be added to the header that can be used by both bugreport.c
> and other existing users of the same subsystem (e.g. if it is about
> in-core index, perhaps cache.h).

Are you asking me to have only builtin/bugreport.c and implement each
function there, and eliminate both <basedir>/bugreport.[ch]?

It may be true that deciding to put this functionality into a library
"in case someone needs it later" was premature, so I can do that - I
just want to make sure I understand you.

 - Emily



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux