Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: > On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 07:28:55AM +0000, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > >> > Do we need all four of these? >> I copied the exact set of messages from git-pack-objects, and I do think >> the same set makes sense specifically to mirror pack-objects for the >> moment. > > I'm not sure I agree. In what situation would anybody use "git bundle > create --all-progress-implied", for example? Literally no other Git > command except pack-objects has "--all-progress" or > "--all-progress-implied" (even ones which call pack-objects under the > hood to print the progress!), and the presence of the latter in > pack-objects is due to a backwards-compatibility thing in the early days > (where --all-progress did too many things, but we could no longer change > it). I think it would be a mistake to spread it further. I am quite cure I agree with your reasoning that we would want to limit the "--all-progress-implied" craziness from spreading ;-) Thanks.
