On 2019-10-31 13:41:18 -0400, Jeff King wrote: > So I think your patch is the right thing to do (hex escapes in shell > printf are definitely not portable), but we might want to note something > like: > > This wasn't caught by most people running the tests, even though > common shells like dash don't handle hex escapes, because their > systems don't trigger the NO_UTF16_BOM prereq. But systems with musl > libc do; when combined with dash, the test fails. Make sense. I will take this note in the reroll. -- Danh
