On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 4:09 AM Bert Wesarg bert.wesarg-at-googlemail.com |GitHub Public/Example Allow| <xlwsizdz58ciy7t@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > in Git speak, that operation is called 'clean' (see 'git clean') why > should we overload the 'revert' operation here? It's less about overloading the 'revert' operation as overloading the UI action which is currently called "Revert". I think it would be a worse experience to have to activate a different option to remove unwanted files as to remove unwanted changes. Maybe the UI option could be renamed "Revert & Clean" or something? As a side note, `git clean untracked-file` won't do anything with a default configuration, you have to explicitly `-f` it. Not sure if that's relevant, but it does feel like a higher barrier to entry than `git revert`. Thanks, Jonathan Gilbert
