Re: [PATCH 1/2] update-index: optionally leave skip-worktree entries alone

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes:

>> Isn't this something reasonably easy to guard against regression with
>> a test or two?
>
> I sent out a v2 with tests added to 1/2.

Good; that way, not just "stash" but anything that relies on update-index
would be protected from regressions.

Thanks.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux