Re: [PATCH 0/2] Fix git stash with skip-worktree entries

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes:

>> Yeah, I do not recall seeing any of the patches in the topic (nor
>> the cover letter).  It is not clear to me what "lose" above means,
>> which is an indication that I didn't read the topic a month ago X-<.
>
> Sorry, in this context, "to lose a file" means that a `git stash` would
> record such a file as deleted. A subsequent `git stash apply` _would_
> then delete it.

That would be a good thing to explain in the log message.

Thanks.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux