Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes: >> Still, I rely pretty heavily on t6036, t6042, t6043, and t6046 for >> sanity in the face of refactoring and rewriting -- and as mentioned >> before they have caught refactoring bugs in those areas that appear at >> first blush as "overzealous", ... > > One idea would be to try to guard those extra careful tests behind the > `EXPENSIVE` prereq. Yeah, I like that---I think it is perfectly in line with the spirit of EXPENSIVE, too.
