Re: What is a reasonable mixed workflow for git/git-cvsserver?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Jul 23, 2007, at 12:59 PM, Martin Langhoff wrote:

What is a reasonable way to handle the unsorted commits
from a shared branch in a more git-ish way? I googled a bit
but didn't find a good explanation on the web.

I am not sure what you mean by unsorted commits... "proposed patches"?
The git project itself has a proposed-updates branch that might serve
as an example. And repo.or.cz has the strange concept of the mob
branch that you might want to have a look at.

The mob branch seems to be related, although I do not plan for
an anonymous mob but only for the cvs mob ...

If several people commit to the same shared branch exported by
git-cvsserver they most likely will generate a series of unsorted
commits, as they did in the past on a single cvs branch. The
commits will probably deal with various topics, include bug fixes,
and some are likely more experimental and not really ready for a
stable branch.

My question is how to deal with this shared branch on the git
side. Should a core developer rebuild a sane history from such
a shared/mixed/unsorted branch by cherry picking the commits
to one or more topic branches? If one did so, how could one
bring the git-ish history back to the people connected by cvs?
Am I allowed to reset branches exported by git-cvsserver?
Probably not?

	Steffen

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux