Re: [PATCH 10/23] fsck_describe_object(): build on our get_object_name() primitive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes:

> This isolates the implementation detail of using the decoration code to
> our put/get functions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Arguably this could be squashed into the previous commit. By not doing
> so, it made describe_object() more of a pure code movement.

Indeed it did.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux