Re: [RFC] describe: add option --dirty

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Yasushi SHOJI <yashi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> when --dirty is given, git describe will check the working tree and
> append "-dirty" to describe string if the tree is dirty.
> ---
> I'm not sure this is good idea or the current way (using diff-index in
> shell script) is more prefered.

Yea, I'm actually torn on this.  A lot of people like the output of
git-describe for versions (where a lot is at least me!) and yet I
also always tack in the -dirty if the directory is dirty according
to diff-index.  So having this built right into git-describe is
actually quite handy.  It simplifies a little bit of build rule
logic.

> diff --git a/Documentation/git-describe.txt b/Documentation/git-describe.txt
> @@ -53,6 +53,9 @@ OPTIONS
>  	being employed to standard error.  The tag name will still
>  	be printed to standard out.
>  
> +--dirty::
> +	Append "-dirty" to describe string if working tree is dirty.
> +

It requires a working directory.  Running this in a bare repository
with --dirty won't work.  You might want to discuss that in the
documentation.

> diff --git a/builtin-describe.c b/builtin-describe.c
> @@ -229,12 +231,23 @@ static void describe(const char *arg, int last_one)
>  				sha1_to_hex(gave_up_on->object.sha1));
>  		}
>  	}
> +	if (check_dirty) {
> +		const char **args = xmalloc(5 * sizeof(char*));
> +		args[0] = "diff-index";
> +		args[1] = "--quiet";
> +		args[2] = "--name-only";
> +		args[3] = "HEAD";
> +		args[4] = NULL;
> +		if (cmd_diff_index(4, args, prefix))
> +			dirty_string = "-dirty";
> +	}

So if I describe two different commits at once in the same working
tree you are going to run diff-index twice?  That's not a great idea.
The outcome of diff-index won't change between those two commits.
Better to compute this up front before calling the describe()
function, and instead of passing in prefix pass in dirty_string.
Or just make it a global, like you did to the option flag.

>  	if (abbrev == 0)
> -		printf("%s\n", all_matches[0].name->path );
> +		printf("%s%s\n", all_matches[0].name->path, dirty_string);
>  	else
> -		printf("%s-%d-g%s\n", all_matches[0].name->path,
> +		printf("%s-%d-g%s%s\n", all_matches[0].name->path,
>  		       all_matches[0].depth,
> -		       find_unique_abbrev(cmit->object.sha1, abbrev));
> +		       find_unique_abbrev(cmit->object.sha1, abbrev),
> +		       dirty_string);
>  
>  	if (!last_one)
>  		clear_commit_marks(cmit, -1);

So if HEAD is exactly matching a tag you don't output the -dirty
suffix, even if the working tree is dirty?  That's counter to the
documentation above.  See l.150-154, we break out of the describe
function very quickly if there is a tag on the input commit.

-- 
Shawn.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux