Hi Jerome,
On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 08:49:41AM +0000, Jerome Pouiller wrote:
> On Wednesday 23 October 2019 04:24:58 CEST Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > Jerome Pouiller <Jerome.Pouiller@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> > > I try to use "git am" to apply a patch sent using "git send-email". This
> > > patch does not apply properly. I try to use "git am --show-current-patch"
> > > to understand the problem. However, since original mail is encoded in quoted-
> > > printable, data returned by --show-current-patch is not a valid patch.
> >
> > I agree that --show-current-patch is a misdesigned feature. We'd be
> > doing a better service to our users if we documented that the patch
> > and log message are found at .git/rebase-apply/{patch,msg} instead
> > of trying to hide the path.
> >
> > Unfortunately, it is likely that those who added that feature have
> > built their tooling around it to depend on its output being the full
> > e-mail message "am" was fed (and split by "git mailsplit"). So I do
> > not think we will be changing the output to the patch file only.
> >
> > But even then, the documentation can be fixed without any backward
> > compatibility issues. Perhaps like this?
> >
> > Documentation/git-am.txt | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/git-am.txt b/Documentation/git-am.txt
> > index 6f6c34b0f4..f63b70325c 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/git-am.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/git-am.txt
> > @@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ default. You can use `--no-utf8` to override this.
> > untouched.
> >
> > --show-current-patch::
> > - Show the patch being applied when "git am" is stopped because
> > + Show the entire e-mail message "git am" has stopped at, because
> > of conflicts.
>
> I agree with you: I think that manpage and/or output of "git am" should
> mention ".git/rebase-apply/patch" (that is exactly what I was looking
> for).
I am currently have a WIP patchset that will print the location of the
failed patch file (.git/rebase-apply/patch) in the case of a failure as
well as the line number. Will this be sufficient for your purposes?
Thanks,
Denton
>
> Maybe documentation of --show-current-patch should be clarified with a
> note like "This option is mainly for internal purpose. If you want to
> get current patch, rely on .git/rebase-apply/patch".
>
>
> --
> Jérôme Pouiller
>
