Re: [RFC PATCH 10/10] pack-objects: improve partial packfile reuse

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes:

>> Hmm, I am kind of surprised that the decoding side allowed such a
>> padding.
>
> IIRC, the "padding" is just a sequence of 0-length-plus-continuation-bit
> varint bytes. And for some reason it worked for the size but not for the
> delta offset value.

I think the reason is because they use different varint definition.

The encoding used in builtin/pack-objects.c::write_no_reuse_object()
is for offsets, and it came much later and with an improvement over
the encoding used for delta size in diff-delta.c::create_delta().
The more recent encoding does not allow padding (when I compare the
decoders for these two encodings, I notice there is +1 for each
7-bit iteration; this essentially declares that a byte with "not the
final byte" bit set with all other bits clear does not mean 0 but it
means 1, which breaks the idea of padding to encode filler zero
bits).



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux