jk/code-of-conduct, was Re: What's cooking in git.git (Oct 2019, #02; Mon, 7)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Junio,

On Mon, 7 Oct 2019, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Here are the topics that have been cooking.  Commits prefixed with
> '-' are only in 'pu' (proposed updates) while commits prefixed with
> '+' are in 'next'.  The ones marked with '.' do not appear in any of
> the integration branches, but I am still holding onto them.
>
> You can find the changes described here in the integration branches
> of the repositories listed at
>
>     http://git-blame.blogspot.com/p/git-public-repositories.html
>
> --------------------------------------------------
> [...]
> [New Topics]
>
> [...]

I missed a well-ACKed contribution in here: the code of conduct Peff
kindly submitted, with the add-on that clarifies who is in that group of
potential mediators. See

https://public-inbox.org/git/20190924064454.GA30419@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/

and

https://public-inbox.org/git/20190926072046.GB20653@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/

As far as I can tell, there was only one critical voice, Gábor, and when
I responded asking for clarifications which part of the code of conduct
exactly would require any change of behavior, there was no response,
which I took as a silent sign of acquiescence.

René also offered concerns about a part of the code of conduct that they
considered to be too vague, but I think both Peff and I explained why it
should remain as-is (again, there was no response, which I, again, am
forced to interpret, and I interpret it as agreeing to the points made
in particular by Peff).

In contrast, the patch won support from the cURL maintainer
(https://public-inbox.org/git/alpine.DEB.2.20.1909250834220.4757@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/),
and endorsements (also known as ACKs) from myself
(https://public-inbox.org/git/nycvar.QRO.7.76.6.1909241426580.15067@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/),
from Stolee
(https://public-inbox.org/git/6a9fb4c2-6c80-4475-03d3-89bdba73095b@xxxxxxxxx/),
from Phillip Wood (although I don't dare to interpet this as a full ACK)
(https://public-inbox.org/git/cc8cc0b3-777c-6ef8-202f-ea1d0518bbd3@xxxxxxxxx/),
from Garima
(https://public-inbox.org/git/133b46b2-b2e1-4673-820b-5a5ca6ec0269@xxxxxxxxx/),
from Jonathan Tan
(https://public-inbox.org/git/20190924172324.104795-1-jonathantanmy@xxxxxxxxxx/),
from Thomas Gummerer
(https://public-inbox.org/git/20190924174056.GA55104@cat/), from
brian
(https://public-inbox.org/git/20190924233728.6iueqaktlhhfwn7k@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/),
and from Elijah
(https://public-inbox.org/git/CABPp-BERhEp2At-ABPrkCHcqLfb32t+S0hPHs=d17QjcZR1wPA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/).

In other words, the commit message can be augmented by this:

Acked-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@xxxxxx>
Acked-by: Derrick Stolee <stolee@xxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Garima Singh <garimasigit@xxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Thomas Gummerer <t.gummerer@xxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Elijah Newren <newren@xxxxxxxxx>

Junio, would you mind picking it up, please?

Ciao,
Dscho

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux