Hi Thomas,
On Tue, 8 Oct 2019, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Oct 2019, Thomas Gummerer wrote:
>
> > Subject: [PATCH] range-diff: don't segfault with mode-only changes
> >
> > If we don't have a new file, deleted file or renamed file in a diff,
> > we currently add 'patch.new_name' to the range-diff header. This
> > works well for files that are changed. However if we have a pure mode
> > change, 'patch.new_name' is NULL, and thus range-diff segfaults.
> >
> > We can however rely on 'patch.def_name' in that case, which is
> > extracted from the 'diff --git' line and should be equal to
> > 'patch.new_name'. Use that instead to avoid the segfault.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Gummerer <t.gummerer@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > range-diff.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
> > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/range-diff.c b/range-diff.c
> > index ba1e9a4265..d8d906b3c6 100644
> > --- a/range-diff.c
> > +++ b/range-diff.c
> > @@ -116,20 +116,20 @@ static int read_patches(const char *range, struct string_list *list)
> > if (len < 0)
> > die(_("could not parse git header '%.*s'"), (int)len, line);
> > strbuf_addstr(&buf, " ## ");
> > - if (patch.is_new > 0)
> > + free(current_filename);
> > + if (patch.is_new > 0) {
> > strbuf_addf(&buf, "%s (new)", patch.new_name);
> > - else if (patch.is_delete > 0)
> > + current_filename = xstrdup(patch.new_name);
> > + } else if (patch.is_delete > 0) {
> > strbuf_addf(&buf, "%s (deleted)", patch.old_name);
> > - else if (patch.is_rename)
> > - strbuf_addf(&buf, "%s => %s", patch.old_name, patch.new_name);
> > - else
> > - strbuf_addstr(&buf, patch.new_name);
> > -
> > - free(current_filename);
> > - if (patch.is_delete > 0)
> > current_filename = xstrdup(patch.old_name);
> > - else
> > + } else if (patch.is_rename) {
> > + strbuf_addf(&buf, "%s => %s", patch.old_name, patch.new_name);
> > current_filename = xstrdup(patch.new_name);
> > + } else {
> > + strbuf_addstr(&buf, patch.def_name);
> > + current_filename = xstrdup(patch.def_name);
> > + }
> >
> > if (patch.new_mode && patch.old_mode &&
> > patch.old_mode != patch.new_mode)
> > --
>
> I am not quite sure that this fixes it...
Whoops. I should learn to distrust `git apply` claiming success when
running in `t/`. (I tried to apply your patch, but nothing was actually
applied before I ran `make`.)
So it totally fixes the issue (feel free to just pick up the regression
test case).
Having said that, I would agree with Junio that it'd be nicer to make
`parse_git_diff_header()` more useful to all of its callers, including
future ones.
Sorry for the misreport, and thanks for all the patch,
Dscho
> Here is my regression test case:
>
> -- snipsnap --
> diff --git a/t/t3206-range-diff.sh b/t/t3206-range-diff.sh
> index ec548654ce1..6aca7f5a5b1 100755
> --- a/t/t3206-range-diff.sh
> +++ b/t/t3206-range-diff.sh
> @@ -354,4 +354,18 @@ test_expect_success 'format-patch --range-diff as commentary' '
> grep "> 1: .* new message" 0001-*
> '
>
> +test_expect_success 'range-diff and mode-only changes' '
> + git switch -c mode-only &&
> +
> + test_commit mode-only &&
> +
> + : pretend it is executable &&
> + git add --chmod=+x mode-only.t &&
> + chmod a+x mode-only.t &&
> + test_tick &&
> + git commit -m mode-only &&
> +
> + git range-diff @^...
> +'
> +
> test_done
>
>
>
