[PATCH v3 21/20] convert: drop invalid comment for subprocess_entry

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Eric Wong <e@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > Comments stating that "struct hashmap_entry" must be the first
> > member in a struct are no longer valid.
> 
> After this patch, there is one "/* must be the first member! */"
> comment left in convert.c, which is both misleading and unfortunate;
> a structure 'subprocess_entry' wants to be the first field of any
> enclosing structure, where 'subprocess_entry' has a hashmap_entry as
> its first field.

Oops, I was only grepping for hashmap_entry :x
Thanks for the sharp eyes :>

Also, the first member requirement for the oidmap stuff could be
lifted sometime in the future...

----8<-----
Subject: [PATCH] convert: drop invalid comment for subprocess_entry

"struct hashmap_entry" inside "struct subprocess_entry"
no longer needs to be the first member of any struct,
so the old comment is no longer true.

Signed-off-by: Eric Wong <e@xxxxxxxxx>
Reported-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 convert.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/convert.c b/convert.c
index 94ff837649..93c1e1eae9 100644
--- a/convert.c
+++ b/convert.c
@@ -753,7 +753,7 @@ static int apply_single_file_filter(const char *path, const char *src, size_t le
 #define CAP_DELAY    (1u<<2)
 
 struct cmd2process {
-	struct subprocess_entry subprocess; /* must be the first member! */
+	struct subprocess_entry subprocess;
 	unsigned int supported_capabilities;
 };
 



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux