Denton Liu <liu.denton@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Thu, Oct 03, 2019 at 05:03:14AM +0900, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> Denton Liu <liu.denton@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >> > which is in the middle of the log message. I expect the line to be >> > reported as something in the range of 198-203,... >> >> That comes from not knowing who is complaining and what it is >> reading. In this case, "git apply" issues a warning because it is >> fed .git/rebase-apply/patch file, which is the output of mailinfo >> that parses header & log message out, leaves the message in a >> separate 'msg' file in the same directory and stores the rest in >> that 'patch' file. And it is line 87 that has problems. > > In this case, I would still regard this as a bug since users would > expect the line 87 to refer to their input file. I think most users > don't even realise that a .git/rebase-apply/patch file exists. (I > certainly didn't.) In any case, if the error message required me to look anywhere outside the patch file, it would make it impossible for me to work. 100% of the time, I just pipe the entire message from MUA to "git am", and I wouldn't know which line it is complaining if it counted the long run of mail headers like Received:, etc., because I do not have such an entire message anywhere in a single file (only my MUA has it, so I'd need to pipe it to "cat >tempfile" again after seeing a failure). > In fact, running `git am --show-current-patch` shows the whole mail, not > only the 'patch' file so users would have no reason to expect the line > numbers to refer to the 'patch' file. Yeah, show-current-patch was a misguided attempt to hide useful information from the users.
