[PATCH v4] diffcore-break: use a goto instead of a redundant if statement

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The condition "if (q->nr <= j)" checks whether the loop exited normally
or via a break statement. This check can be avoided by replacing the
jump out of the inner loop with a jump to the end of the outer loop.

With the break replaced by a goto, the two diff_q calls then can be
replaced with a single diff_q call outside of the outer if statement.

Signed-off-by: Alex Henrie <alexhenrie24@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 diffcore-break.c | 14 ++++++--------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/diffcore-break.c b/diffcore-break.c
index 875aefd3fe..ee7519d959 100644
--- a/diffcore-break.c
+++ b/diffcore-break.c
@@ -286,17 +286,15 @@ void diffcore_merge_broken(void)
 					/* Peer survived.  Merge them */
 					merge_broken(p, pp, &outq);
 					q->queue[j] = NULL;
-					break;
+					goto next;
 				}
 			}
-			if (q->nr <= j)
-				/* The peer did not survive, so we keep
-				 * it in the output.
-				 */
-				diff_q(&outq, p);
+			/* The peer did not survive, so we keep
+			 * it in the output.
+			 */
 		}
-		else
-			diff_q(&outq, p);
+		diff_q(&outq, p);
+next:;
 	}
 	free(q->queue);
 	*q = outq;
-- 
2.23.0




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux