> > As a community, our number one goal is for Git to continue to be the best > > distributed version control system. At minimum, it should continue to be > > the most widely-used DVCS. > > I'd rather we stated our goal in terms of what problems we are trying > to address rather than accolades we want sent our way. E.g. "Our goal > is to make developers more productive by providing them increasingly > useful version control software". > Agreed. And why restrict on DVCS? Isn't it admitted that the distributed version control is nowadays much better in term of software productivity? Is there some use cases that "traditional" centralized VCS are better on, and on which we gave up as a goal? Regards, Pierre
