Re: Git in Outreachy December 2019?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 04:25:45PM +0200, Johannes Schindelin wrote:

> > I think it could make sense for merge-index to be able to directly run
> > the merge-one-file code[1]. But I think we'd want to keep its ability to
> > run an arbitrary script, and for people to call merge-one-file
> > separately, since right now you can do:
> >
> >   git merge-index my-script
> >
> > and have "my-script" do some processing of its own, then hand off more
> > work to merge-one-file.
> 
> Oh, sorry, I did not mean to say that we should do away with this at
> all! Rather, I meant to say that `merge-index` could detect when it was
> asked to run `git-merge-one-file` and re-route to internal code instead
> of spawning a process. If any other script/program was specified, it
> should be spawned off, just like it is done today.

OK, great, then we are completely on the same page. :)

-Peff



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux