Re: [PATCH 0/1] git-config --add allows values from stdin

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Taylor and ZJ

On 22/09/2019 04:11, Taylor Blau wrote:
Hi ZJ,

On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 03:31:34PM +0200, Zeger-Jan van de Weg wrote:
When adding or updating configuration values using git-config, the
values could all be observed by different processes as these are passed
as arguments. In some environments all commands executed are also all
logged. When the value contains secrets, this is a side effect that
would be great to avoid.

How much extra security does this actually add? - do the processes that can observe the command line arguments also have read access to the git config file?

 At GitLab we use Rugged/libgit2 to circumvent
this property[1].

The following patch allows a value to be set through stdin when the user
passes a `--stdin` flag.

Interesting. I had thought some time ago about making an interactive
line-oriented 'mode' for using 'git-config(1)', which would allow
callers to add/delete/fetch multiple variables using only a single
process.

This would satisfy a more general use-case than yours: particularly my
idea was grown out of wanting to specify or read many configuration
entries at once when using a tool built around Git, such as Git LFS.

I had not considered tying '--stdin' to the '--add' (implicit or not)
mode of 'git-config(1)'. It is an interesting idea to be sure.

On the one hand, it lends itself to other modes, such as '--get'
combined with '--stdin', or '--unset' in the same fashion. One could
imagine that each of these would take either a key/value-pair (in the
case of '--add') or a set of key(s) (in the remaining cases). The most
desirable aspect is that this would allow for a clear path to this
series being picked up.

It would be great to be able to --get multiple values and I can see people wanting to be able to --unset them as well.

On the other hand, tying '--stdin' to a particular mode of using 'git
conifg' seems overly restrictive to me. If I am building a tool that
wants to fetch some values in the configuration, and then add/unset
others based on the results using only a single process, I don't think
that a mode-based '--stdin' flag gets the job done.

That's true but I don't know how common it is compared to a script wanting to read a bunch of config variables at startup (i.e. does it warrant the extra complexity)

Best Wishes

Phillip

One happy medium that comes to mind is a new '--interactive' mode, which
implies '--stdin' and would allow the above use-case, e.g.:

   $ git config --interactive <<\EOF
   get core.myval
   set core.foo bar
   unset core.baz
   EOF

(An off-topic note is that it would be interesting to allow more
fanciful options than 'get', e.g., 'get' with a '--type' specifier, or
some such).

I'm not sure if anyone actually wants to use 'git-config(1)' in this
way, but I figured that I would at least share some things that I was
thinking about when initially considering this proposal.

[1]: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitaly/blob/8ab5bd595984678838f3f09a96798b149e68a939/ruby/lib/gitlab/git/http_auth.rb#L14-15

Zeger-Jan van de Weg (1):
   Git config allows value setting from stdin

  Documentation/git-config.txt |  5 ++++-
  builtin/config.c             | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++--
  t/t1300-config.sh            | 11 +++++++++++
  3 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--
2.23.0


Thanks,
Taylor




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux