On 2019-09-22 at 18:01:43, SZEDER Gábor wrote: > diff --git a/builtin/name-rev.c b/builtin/name-rev.c > index c785fe16ba..a4d8d312ab 100644 > --- a/builtin/name-rev.c > +++ b/builtin/name-rev.c > @@ -9,7 +9,11 @@ > #include "sha1-lookup.h" > #include "commit-slab.h" > > -#define CUTOFF_DATE_SLOP 86400 /* one day */ > +/* > + * One day. See the 'name a rev close to epoch' test in t6120 when This piece of code says "close to"… > +test_expect_success 'name-rev a rev shortly after epoch' ' …but this says "shortly after." Overall, I think the idea is definitely sane, though. -- brian m. carlson: Houston, Texas, US OpenPGP: https://keybase.io/bk2204
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
