On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 08:13:02PM +0200, SZEDER Gábor wrote: > > If the (re)introduced leak doesn't impact performance and memory > > usage too much then duplicating tip_name again in name_rev() or > > rather your new create_or_update_name() would likely make the > > lifetimes of those string buffers easier to manage. > > Yeah, the easiest would be when each 'struct rev_name' in the commit > slab would have its own 'tip_name' string, but that would result in > a lot of duplicated strings and increased memory usage. I didn't measure how much more memory would be used, though.
