On 9/18/2019 4:43 AM, Jakub Narebski wrote: > Derrick Stolee <stolee@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> On 6/25/2019 3:51 AM, Jakub Narebski wrote: >>> Jakub Narebski <jnareb@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >>>> Derrick Stolee <stolee@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > [...] >>>> O.K., so the "generation number v2 (legacy)" would be incremental and >>>> backward-compatibile in use (though not in generation and validation). > [...] >>>> Do you have benchmark for this "monotonically offset corrected commit >>>> date" generation number in https://github.com/derrickstolee/git/commits/reach-perf >>>> and https://github.com/derrickstolee/gen-test ? >>> >>> I guess this will have to wait... >> >> I have not had time to revisit this topic and re-run performance >> numbers, sorry. > > I have created pull requests against `reach-perf` branch of > derrickstolee/git repository[1], and companion pull request against > gen-test repository[2] with proposed prototype of backward-compatible > corrected commit date (with monotonic offsets). > > Could you please run the tests for this generation number v5? I'll try to get to this, but it may take a few days. > I was not > able to do so. It was my first time trying to compile Git on MS > Windows, and while there were no problems compiling `master` (well, > except for compilation taking a long time), I was unable to do it for > `reach-perf` branch because of independent of change compilation errors. I don't think I tested this on Windows. I do most of my performance tests in Linux, especially when presenting numbers to the mailing list. The gen-test repo has a bunch of shell scripts that I used for testing in that environment. Thanks, -Stolee
