Re: pd/fetch-jobs, was Re: What's cooking in git.git (Sep 2019, #01; Sat, 7)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 16 Sep 2019 10:43:28 PDT (-0700), gitster@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

...  It looks
like there are some test failures when I rebase to the latest master,
which I'm happy to fix.  Just let me know if I should:

* Send just the first 4 patches, holding onto the last one for later.
...
* Send just a single patch, which wouldn't add the --fetch-jobs and
--submodule-fetch-jobs arguments.

It is either one of these two, I would say.  I am personally much
more comfotable with the usual "backward incompatibility migration"
form (i.e. the former), but apparently I am nto the only person on
the list so ... ;-)

OK, well, just dropping the last patch causes the tests to pass when rebased on master, so I'll send that out as it's easier for me. Is there a policy for deprecation timelines?



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux