Re: [PATCH 2/2] sha1-name: check for overflow of N in "foo^N" and "foo~N"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 15.09.19 um 17:15 schrieb brian m. carlson:
> This approach seems reasonable.  I must admit some curiosity as to how
> you discovered this issue, though.  Did you have a cat assisting you in
> typing revisions?

Found it by reading the code, but I'm not sure anymore what I was
actually looking for.

Would a fuzzer (or a cat) be able to catch that?  The function is
happily eating extra digits -- it's not crashing for me.

René




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux