On Fri, Sep 06, 2019 at 02:57:55PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > I think the "stock git without any other job infrastructure" is > > a very important scenario. Putting the simplest version of > > "commit-graph writes in-line with every push" seems to be ripe > > for failure under load. I'd rather think deeply about what is > > best for this scenario. > > As to what to do on the push side, I suppose we can afford to let it > simmer in the back of our heads while moving this topic forward. > Whether we'd later decide to have receive.writeCommitGraph (in which > case we would add transfer.writeCommitGraph, too) or not, this > change on the fetch side can independently be used, right? Yeah, I'm OK with proceeding without the receive-pack side for now. -Peff
