Re: [PATCH v2 00/13] format-patch: clean up tests and documentation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Denton Liu <liu.denton@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Hi Junio,
>
> I see that "dl/format-patch-doc-test-cleanup" currently has the comment
> "Expecting a reroll." This should be the reroll that you're expecting ;)
>
> Also, since there haven't been any comments on the topic in a while, I
> propose that it should be ready for inclusion.

I may be the only person who had issues applying that series from
the list, with mixtures of iso-8859-1 and utf-8 causing troubles,
but if I am not alone, I suspect that the reason why nobody gave a
comment is because the patches did not even apply so there is
nothing to base their comments on.

I wiggled them and compared the result.  The range diff against what
has been queued seems a bit different from what you gave below
(e.g. I see log message got modified on patch #2 and the dropping of
the comma made it harder to read), but the endpoint diff looks not
too bad (IOW, the alloted time for the topic ran out before I
started looking at each individual patches in more depth).






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux