Re: [PATCH] Fix maybe-uninitialized warnings found by gcc 9 -flto

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



René Scharfe <l.s.r@xxxxxx> writes:

> The loop count is either 1 or argv[1] interpreted as a number, i.e. it could
> be very high.  Its body consists of an index load and writing a number to a
> file, though -- a strlen() call on the name of that file should go unnoticed
> amid that activity.  (I didn't measure it, though.)

Yup, I didn't either but we reasoned along the same line.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux