Re: [PATCH] [PATCH] git-gui: Add hotkeys to set widget focus

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 4:22 PM Pratyush Yadav <me@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 02/09/19 09:42PM, Bert Wesarg wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 1, 2019 at 9:37 PM Birger Skogeng Pedersen
> > <birger.sp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > The user cannot change focus between the list of files, the diff view and
> > > the commit message widgets without using the mouse (clicking either of
> > > the four widgets).
> > >
> > > With this patch, the user may set ui focus to the previously selected path
> > > in either the "Unstaged Changes" or "Staged Changes" widgets, using
> > > CTRL/CMD+1 or CTRL/CMD+2.
> > >
> > > The user may also set the ui focus to the diff view widget with
> > > CTRL/CMD+3, or to the commit message widget with CTRL/CMD+4.
> > >
> > > This enables the user to select/unselect files, view the diff and create a
> > > commit in git-gui using keyboard-only.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Birger Skogeng Pedersen <birger.sp@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >  git-gui.sh | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > >  1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/git-gui.sh b/git-gui.sh
> > > index 5bc21b8..ce620f1 100755
> > > --- a/git-gui.sh
> > > +++ b/git-gui.sh
> > > @@ -2495,7 +2495,7 @@ proc force_first_diff {after} {
> > >
> > >  proc toggle_or_diff {mode w args} {
> > >         global file_states file_lists current_diff_path ui_index ui_workdir
> > > -       global last_clicked selected_paths
> > > +       global last_clicked selected_paths file_lists_last_clicked
> > >
> > >         if {$mode eq "click"} {
> > >                 foreach {x y} $args break
> > > @@ -2527,6 +2527,8 @@ proc toggle_or_diff {mode w args} {
> > >         $ui_index tag remove in_sel 0.0 end
> > >         $ui_workdir tag remove in_sel 0.0 end
> > >
> > > +       set file_lists_last_clicked($w) $lno
> >
> > So we only remember the lno in the widget, that could mean, that we
> > select the wrong file after a rescan, which shifted the previous path
> > one down. Can we remember the pathname instead, and try to find this
> > again in the file list?
>
> I raised a similar concern. Birger's response was that it is not a
> trivial change for him, and he needs help with it. So I decided to keep
> it like it is.
>
> But now I thought about it a bit more, and I don't think it should be
> too difficult. A quick look tells me that $file_lists should be a sorted
> list with unique entries (git-gui.sh::display_file_helper{}), so it
> shouldn't be too difficult to find a given path. display_file_helper
> does:
>
>   set lno [lsearch -sorted -exact $file_lists($w) $path]
>
> which should also be what we want.
>
> I have a quick-and-dirty fix for it. Haven't tested it too well, but it
> seems to work for some basic things like removing a file and refreshing,
> and then selecting focus again. Do give it a spin. I'll send the patch
> in reply to this email.
>
> > > +
> > >         # Determine the state of the file
> > >         if {[info exists file_states($path)]} {
> > >                 set state [lindex $file_states($path) 0]
> > > @@ -2640,6 +2642,29 @@ proc show_less_context {} {
> > >         }
> > >  }
> > >
> > > +proc select_path_in {widget} {
> >
> > can we name it 'focus_and_select_path_in', as the main job ob this
> > function is to focus the widget. It makes also the 'bind' command
> > below more readily, because than all bind commands start with 'focus'.
>
> Ah, I was kind of uneasy with the function name, but couldn't come up
> with a good one. This sounds all right. Another suggestion that I'd put
> out: "focus_widget". As you said, focusing a widget is the main job of
> this function. Selecting paths is secondary. IMO it should be fine to
> not have "select_path_in" in the function name because you select the
> path in the process of focusing on widget.
>
> > > +       global file_lists last_clicked selected_paths ui_workdir
> >
> > ui_workdir not referenced in this function
>
> Nice catch.
>
> > > +       global file_lists_last_clicked
> > > +
> > > +       set _list_length [llength $file_lists($widget)]
> > > +       if {$_list_length > 0} {
> > > +
> > > +               set _index $file_lists_last_clicked($widget)
> >
> > I have the impression that variables starting with '_' are mainly used
> > as read-only global variables, see the list at line 158, and not that
> > often as temporal local variables.
> >
> > > +               if {$_index eq {}} {
> > > +                       set _index 1
> > > +               } elseif {$_index > $_list_length} {
> > > +                       set _index $_list_length
> > > +               }
> > > +
> > > +               focus $widget
> > > +               set last_clicked [list $widget $_index]
> > > +               set path [lindex $file_lists($widget) [expr $_index - 1]]
> > > +               array unset selected_paths
> > > +               set selected_paths($path) 1
> > > +               show_diff $path $widget
> > > +       }
> > > +}
> > > +
> > >  ######################################################################
> > >  ##
> > >  ## ui construction
> > > @@ -3852,6 +3877,14 @@ foreach i [list $ui_index $ui_workdir] {
> > >  }
> > >  unset i
> > >
> > > +bind . <$M1B-Key-1> {select_path_in $::ui_workdir}
> > > +bind . <$M1B-Key-2> {select_path_in $::ui_index}
> > > +bind . <$M1B-Key-3> {focus $::ui_diff}
> > > +bind . <$M1B-Key-4> {focus $::ui_comm}
> >
> > I would like to bring up a proposal: AFAICS, more or less all CTRL
> > bindings have a menu entry. But it does not make sense to have a menu
> > entry for these bindings. And I think we could add more bindings for
> > keyboard-afine users. Thus I would like to propose to use ALT as the
> > modifier for these bindings, which would give us a nice binding
> > classification.
> >
> > How about that?
>
> FWIW, I agree with this. To add to this, it would also somewhat match
> with bindings in other programs. For example, in Firefox you can choose
> tabs 0-9 with Alt+0-9. In gnome-terminal, you can also choose tabs with
> Alt+0-9. AFAIK Chrome does this too.

ttk::notebook only provides Ctrl+Tab, Ctrl+Shift+Tab, and
Alt+<mnemonic> keybindings as default tab traversal, thus this should
not conflict with Alt+1-4 to begin with.

>
> My one concern is, does an Alt key exist on Mac (AFAIK it does, but I
> want to be sure)? I don't think we have any existing bindings with Alt,
> so will they work well with Macs?

they should ;-)

https://www.macworld.co.uk/how-to/mac/mac-keyboard-shortcuts-3504584/

Bert

>
> --
> Regards,
> Pratyush Yadav



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux