On Fri, 20 Jul 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Gerrit Pape <pape@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
I'll check with the docbook-xsl Debian maintainer.
The change in docbook-xsl was by intention, please see
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=420114#22
Hmph. Where does that leave us poor users who would want to
support both 1.71 and 1.72, I wonder...
Will they have the same revert in 1.73 for that House Sign, too?
It looks like they do, so perhaps we could just say that you will have
issues building the git docs with 1.72 and ignore my last patch?
(comparing http://docbook.xml-doc.org/snapshots/xsl/manpages/utility.xsl
which has today's date and uses . and \ against
http://docbook.sourceforge.net/release/xsl/1.72.0/manpages/utility.xsl
which uses U+2302 and U+2593)
--
Julian
---
Old MacDonald had an agricultural real estate tax abatement.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
