Re: [PATCH] clarify documentation for remote helpers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



David Turner <David.Turner@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> The only other restriction I see is: in order for the connectivity-skipping 
> optimization to be used, the file with s/.keep/.idx/, and the corresponding 
> pack, must exist.  Do you think that's worth mentioning? It seems to be 
> implied by the rest of the text.

Perhaps if you come up with a way to clarify what is merely implied
(e.g.  "this is a mechanism to name a <pack,idx,keep> tuple by
giving only the keep component to do X"), I would imaging that would
be ideal.

Thanks.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux