Re: [PATCH 04/11] hashmap_entry: detect improper initialization

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Junio,

On Tue, 27 Aug 2019, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> My plan is to have ew/hashmap topic for a few days while ejecting
> the js/add-i topic which semantically conflicts with the changed way
> hashmaps ought to be used temporarily, and when I have enough time
> and concentration, try to see if I can come up with a good semantic
> conflict resolution that I can keep reusing (aka refs/merge-fix/).
> If it happens, we'll see both topics, and if it doesn't, I'll then
> drop ew/hashmap and queue js/add-i and rinse and repeat from there
> ;-)

FWIW I crafted my latest iteration such that you would only need to do
the `hash` => `_hash` rename in one line to merge `js/builtin-add-i`.

Ciao,
Dscho



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux