Denton Liu <liu.denton@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > When reverting or cherry-picking, one of the options we can pass the > sequencer is `--skip`. However, unlike rebasing, `--skip` is not > mentioned as a possible option in the status message. Mention it so that > users are more aware of their options. Is this a good thing, though? Giving up (because you do not have enough time or concentration to finish the cherry-pick or revert in progress) with --abort, and committing to the resolution after spending effort to deal with a conflicted cherry-pick or revert with --continue, are both sensible actions after seeing the command stop due to conflicts. Is "--skip" a recommendable action in the same way? Doesn't a multi-commit series often break if you drop just one in the middle, especially if the series is sensibly structured as a logical progression?
