Re: [RFC PATCH] Re: Empty directories...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Thu, 19 Jul 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> 
> But you _could_ treat that "should-be-kept-even-when-empty"-ness
> just like we treat executable bit on blobs, I think.

True. Or you could make it a path attribute and/or a per-repository 
decision, so that while the data wouldn't necessarily be in the database 
itself, the user could specify the behaviour he wanted.

> This will involve a lot of changes, so I would not recommend
> anybody doing so, though.

Agreed. The upside just isn't there.

		Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux