On 23/08/19 08:04AM, Bert Wesarg wrote: > On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 12:51 AM Pratyush Yadav <me@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On 22/08/19 03:34PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: [...] > as I'm the one who use this feature for more than 7 years, I can only > object to this. I'm happy to have the confirmation dialog for the > whole-file revert (the current state) but having the dialog also for > partial revert would be too disruptive. And disabling both at the same > time would not be an option for me. > > The thing is, that the partial revert "just don't happen by accident". > Here are the minimum user actions needed to get to this dialog: > > 1. whole-file revert > > - do a Ctrl+J, more or less anywhere in the GUI Hmm, have to agree with you on this. It is kind of easy to trigger. But read below why I think partial reverts are just as easy to trigger. > 2. hunk revert/revert one unselected line > > - right click anywhere in the diff pane (thats around 60% of the window area) > - move the mouse pointer down 3/4 menu items > - click this menu item But what if you wanted to click "Stage hunk", and instead click "Revert hunk" instead. This is what I mean by "accidentally". This is even more a risk in the current layout of the buttons, which are in the order: Stage Hunk Revert Hunk Stage Lines Revert Lines In this layout, if you wanted to click Stage, you might end up clicking Revert instead, losing part of your work. Even if we switch up the layout a bit, I feel like the potential of "mis-aiming" your mouse is there, but it can certainly be improved. > 3. partially revert selected lines > > - select some content in the diff pane by starting by pressing and > holding a left click > - end the selection by releasing the left click > - move the mouse pointer down 3/4 menu items > - click this menu item > > Thats always at least 2 user actions more than the whole-file revert. > Thus this cannot happen by accident quite easily in comparison to the > whole-file revert. And thats the reason why this dialog exists, from > my point of view. > > I can see the need to disable the dialog for the whole-file revert, > and IIRC that was also requested a long time ago on this list. But I > don't see a reason to have this dialog also for the partial reverts as > a safety measure. I do (not too strongly, but I do), as I explained why above. It shouldn't be too difficult to have separate knobs for whole-file and partial reverts, but they will add two config options. Not necessarily a bad thing, I just thought the people who wanted to disable partial reverts would also want to disable whole-file reverts. But I have another suggestion in mind. I'll reply to one of the other emails in this thread about it. Please read it there, I'd rather not type it twice. -- Regards, Pratyush Yadav
