Re: [PATCH 2/1] t6300: format missing tagger

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Junio wrote:
> 
> Mischa POSLAWSKY <git@xxxxxxxx> writes:
> > Strip an annotated tag of its tagger header and verify it's ignored
> > correctly in all cases, as fixed in commit e2a81276e8 (ref-filter:
> > initialize empty name or email fields, 2019-08-19).
> 
> I am inclined to squash this test part of the update into the said
> commit; you'd lose one commit count, but hopefully you do not mind?
> 
> My motivation for doing so is that it would allow us to lose the "as
> fixed in commit X" comment in a log message, which in turn would
> mean that the code-fix patch can later be rebased safely without
> having to remember that this one needs to be adjusted ("git rebase"
> does not do such a rewrite for us, and I personally do not think
> "git rebase" should do such a rewrite silently, as I cannot quantify
> the risk of false positives).

Of course.  Might get one commit back if you pick it into maint :)



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux