Hi Phillip On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 12:10 AM Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Thanks for spelling out exactly what this does. I had not appreciated > the difference before. Does this mean that if I have a branch with some > whitespace cleanups I'll get different results if I rebase it with the > sequencer compared to am? (I suspect from the description that the > sequencer will simply ignore all my whitespace changes) I'm afraid that this is the case. > I think this is ready if we can live with the difference - I'm not > entirely convinced that adding an option with the same name and a > different behavior is going to improve things though. This is the first step to improving consistency. We can further improve upon the implementation. I have already mentioned that in the cover letter of previous patches[1]. Thanks Rohit [1]: https://public-inbox.org/git/20190712185015.20585-1-rohit.ashiwal265@xxxxxxxxx/
