Re: suggestion for improved docs on autocrlf

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 03:31:43PM +0000, Yagnatinsky, Mark wrote:
> Thank you once more.  Finally, I believe I understood everything you said.
> I was about to say that this contradicts my own experience.
> But then I remembered that I normally use my IDE rather than the command line.
> And I just checked that indeed that the behavior of my IDE is totally different!

Would you like to elobarate which IDE that is?
The core.autocrlf handling has been improved a couple of times,
and it seams that your IDE does things different from git.git
(Which is not ideal)

> It renormalizes line endings of existing files whenever autocrlf is set to input.
> Sigh.  Okay, great, life makes sense again.  I want to yell at my IDE now.
>
> I now feel brave enough to attempt to come up with better wording for autocrlf docs, if you think that's worth trying.

That would be good, I am happy to review patches.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux