Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Wed, Aug 07, 2019 at 11:56:14PM -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>
>> But a dash bug[*] causes it to instead expand to
>>
>> /3456789...
>>
>> The stream of symbols that makes up this function is hard for humans
>> to follow, too. The complexity mostly comes from the repeated use of
>> the expression ${1#??} for the basename of the loose object.
>
> Yeah, both seem like good reasons to change this (and the patch looks
> good to me).
Good spottig. Thanks.
> +# Check whether the shell supports the "local" keyword. "local" is not
> +# POSIX-standard, but it is very widely supported by POSIX-compliant
> +# shells, and we rely on it within Git's test framework.
> +#
> +# If your shell fails this test, the results of other tests may be
> +# unreliable. You may wish to report the problem to the Git mailing
> +# list <git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, as it could cause us to reconsider
> +# relying on "local".
> test_expect_success 'verify that the running shell supports "local"' '
> x="notlocal" &&
> echo "local" >expected1 &&
Updated text reads well. Leaving the test in is still a very good
idea.
Thanks.
