Re: [PATCH 1/1] merge-recursive: avoid directory rename detection in recursive case

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> > > +
> > > +             test_i18ngrep ! CONFLICT out &&
> > > +             test_i18ngrep ! BUG: err &&
> >
> > The BUG is gone. But should it not use i18ngrep? BUG() isn't localized.
> 
> Technically, yes, you're right. However, this line's purpose isn't
> correctness of the test but documentation for the person reading the
> testcase about what it's real original purpose was; my real test was
> the "test_must_be_empty err" check I have below it, but I added this
> line just to document the intent better.  I kind of like the
> "CONFLICT" and "BUG" lines looking similar just so the reader of the
> testcase doesn't have to try to reason through why they are different,
> although I guess it does present the problem that more careful readers
> like yourself might do a double take.
> 
> If folks find it more readable to use regular grep instead of
> test_i18ngrep, I can change this line as well as the "core dumped"
> check immediately below over to regular grep.
> 

It's fine by me, I see your point.

> Thanks for taking a look.  :-)

Reviewed-by: Emily Shaffer <emilyshaffer@xxxxxxxxxx>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux