René Scharfe <l.s.r@xxxxxx> writes: > Sure, but we'd need to move the code to handle the raw format as well, no? > Perhaps like this? It depends on callers of parse_revision_opt() calling > setup_revisions() before using decorations. And it may have other side > effects; I'm not comfortable with this change. Hmph, fair enough. I missed the fact that we do want to keep "--pretty=raw" being "special" but only in "log"; a move in this direction teaches the revision walk API layer about it, which is probably not a good idea. Thanks for sanity checking.
