On 7/31/2019 12:38 AM, Jeff King wrote: > We store and manipulate the cumulative traverse_info.pathlen as an > "int", which can overflow when we are fed ridiculously long pathnames > (e.g., ones at the edge of 2GB or 4GB, even if the individual tree entry > names are smaller than that). The results can be confusing, though > after some prodding I was not able to use this integer overflow to cause > an under-allocated buffer. > > Let's consistently use size_t to generarate and store these, and make > sure our addition doesn't overflow. nit: s/generarate/generate -Stolee
