On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 11:39:37PM +0000, brian m. carlson wrote: > This is a bug. If the destination side of a refspec is omitted, and the > source side resolves to a ref starting with "refs/heads/" or > "refs/tags/" (which I expect it does here), then that ref is used as the > destination. > > I submitted a patch at [0], but it was decided not to pick it up. If > Junio and the list decide that it's wanted, I'm happy to resend or > revise and resend. > > [0] https://public-inbox.org/git/20180729192803.1047050-1-sandals@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ I see I was cc'd on that original, but I don't remember ever reading it. It seems like a sane enough idea to me. Although I did notice that you mentioned there: > I probably type "git push upstream HEAD" from five to thirty times a > day I find I do that rarely, because I have: [push] default = current and in a triangular workflow, I have: [remote] pushDefault = upstream So "git push" without arguments typically does the same thing for me. Not an argument against your patch, but just something you might find useful. -Peff
