Re: [RFC PATCH 0/9] rebase -i: extend rebase.missingCommitsCheck to `--edit-todo' and co.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Phillip,

Le 24/07/2019 à 15:29, Phillip Wood a écrit :
> Hi Alban
> 
> Thanks for working on this, it's great to see you back on the list and I
> think it would be a useful addition to rebase. Unfortunately I'm not
> sure about this implementation though (although the early bug fix
> patches are useful in their own right)
> 
> On 17/07/2019 15:39, Alban Gruin wrote:
>> To prevent mistakes when editing a branch, rebase features a knob,
>> rebase.missingCommitsCheck, to warn the user if a commit was dropped.
>> Unfortunately, this check is only effective for the initial edit, which
>> means that if you edit the todo list at a later point of the rebase and
>> dropped a commit, no warnings or errors would be issued.
>>
>> This adds the ability to check if commits were dropped when resuming a
>> rebase (with `rebase --continue'), when editing the todo list (with
>> `rebase --edit-todo'), or when reloading the todo list after an `exec'
>> command.
> 
> I'm not sure if we really need to check the todo list when continuing or
> after an exec command.

In which case I don’t really understand why there is an `error' mode if
one can completely bypass it with `--continue'.

> The official way to edit the todo list is to run
> 'git rebase --edit-todo' and I'm not sure if we support scripts writing
> to .git/rebase-merge/git-rebase-todo directly. If we only support the
> check after --edit-todo then I think the implementation can be
> simplified as we can just write a copy of the file before it is edited
> and don't need to check .git/rebase-merge/done. Additionally that would
> catch commits that are added by the user and then deleted in a later
> edit. They wont be in the original list so I don't think this series
> will detect their deletion.
> 

True -- but with this solution, if a bad command is introduced, there
will be false negatives.  Given the pitfall of my solution, this should
be an acceptable trade-off.

> At the extreme I have a script around rebase that runs 'rebase -i HEAD'
> and then fills in the todo list with a fake editor that adds 'reset ...'
> as the first line to set the starting point of the rebase. I think
> dscho's garden-shears script does something similar. Under the proposed
> scheme if I subsequently edit the todo list it will not catch any
> deleted commits as the original list is empty.
> 
> Best Wishes
> 
> Phillip
> 

Cheers,
Alban




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux