Emily Shaffer <emilyshaffer@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Hmm. I'd like to argue that part of the requirement is to show the user > what happened; for example, in an earlier iteration I was not > successfully reporting the "collateral damage" refs to the user, even > though they were not being pushed. To that end, I'd rather check both. If we can afford to check both, making sure that we behave correctly and report what we did correctly would of course be the best. ;-)
