On 27/06/2019 18:10, Dr. Adam Nielsen wrote:
On 25.06.19 13:31, Philip Oakley wrote:
only one minor point...
>>> + - For example, a pattern `doc/frotz/` matches `doc/frotz`
directory,
>>> + but not `a/doc/frotz` directory; however `frotz/` matches `frotz`
>
> her I misread this as: "but not a `doc/frotz` directory;"
> i.e. the leading 'a' is too easy to skim over as is part of the
> sentence's prose, so maybe change to a 'baz' lead directory (bar
already
> having been used below).
Yes we could change that.
Have you tried it out on any StackOverflow replies to see if those
that inhabit that zone find it helpful?
Philip
I answered one person who had a hard time reading the docs at SO, but
he didn't respond and the last time he was online was 2018, so I
didn't made the effort to edit my answer with the current version.
-
What are the next steps? If there are no more responses, does it imply
that everyone agrees with this patch? Can we publish it online?
If all the issues are cleared then I believe it is a case of providing a
clean reroll (maybe identical to previous..) to Junio and the list to
confirm that all issues have been resolved and it is ready for
pu->next->master in the normal way, which should then show up in his
'What's cooking' emails.
